and costs they may sustain by reason of said appeal should the same be
affirmed by the appellate court or the same dismissed
This August 4th 1898
                           W.A. Hocker
                             Judge
Filed 6th of August 1898 Recorded 8th of August 1898
                                       H.C. Denton Clerk
                                           pr S.H. Wienges DC

                    In the Circuit Court Fifth Judicial Circuit of
                      Florida In and for Alachua County, In Chancery
Valerie H. Quiller Couch }
         vs              } Divorce
Harold Q. Quiller Couch  } Final Decree
                This cause coming on to be heard upon the application of
complainants solicitor for a final decree and it appearing to the court that due
and legal service was had upon the defendant and that a Decree Pro Confesso
has been property entered up in said Cause and it further appearing from the
Masters Report and the evidence taken in said cause that the Equities are with
the complainant; it is thereupon considered ordered adjudged and decreed that
the bonds of Matrimony heretofore existing between the said Valerie H. Quiller-
-Couch and the said Harold Q. Quiller Couch defendant be and the same are
hereby annulled and dissolved - and that the costs of this proceeding be
taxed against the complainant.
Done and ordered at Chambers in Ocala Florida this 3rd day of August
AD 1898
                            W.A. Hocker
                                 Judge
Filed 8th August 1898 Recorded 8th of August 1898
                                    H.C. Denton Clerk
                                     pr S.H. Wienges DC

                  In the Circuit Court Alachua County Fla
W.H. Tillis   Plaintiff                  }
          vs                             }
The Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance } 
Company Deft                             }
            This cause is before me on the demurrer of the defendant to
the replications of plaintiff and has been argued by the respective parties.
It is ordered and considered as follows viz; -
1st The demurrer to the replication to the 8th plea is overruled;
2nd The demurrer to the replication to the 9th plea is Sustained;
3rd The demurrer to the replication to the 10th plea is Sustained;
4th The demurrer to the replication to the 11th plea is sustained;
                     Ocala Fla August 4th 1898
(A & E En P & P vol 6 p 462)                  W.A. Hocker
                                                  Judge