Thursday December 17 1857
L.M. Scarborough } Bradford & McLin
Plaintiff in attatchment}
vs } Attatchment
William H. Ellis }
defendant in attatchment} Dewson
The Plaintiff Council will please
take notice that motion will be made to dissolve the attatch
ment in this suit, on the following grounds that the aff
-adavit is not in accordance with the Statute & is other
wise in formal & defective motion granted & attatchment disso
lved & the property levied on thereby ordered to be returned
December 18th 1857
J.S. Borne & Co } Dawkins & Smith
vs } Debt
John W. Peacock } On motion of Council caus Continued
McKeen Carlton } Edwards
vs } Asst
John M. Payne & Co } Means
Like Rule
John Doe on demise of} Bradford & Mc Lin & Mitchell
L. Wilson }
vs } Ejectment
Philip Dell }
Tenant in possession }
On motion of Council Cause continued
declaration to be filed by 10 of January next & CoDefendants
Council to be served with a Copy
Tillman Ingram } Maulden
vs } Debt
John Powers } On motion of Counsel cause dismissed
at Plaintiffs Costs
John B. Standly } Bernard
vs } Asst
Jeptha Knight } And now on this came the said Plaintiff
by his attorney Jessie T. Bernard and the said defendant comes
not but makes default & the said Plaintiff moves for Judgment
for want of a plea & that the Clerk assess the damages & the
Clerk having assessed the damages by reason of the premises
at the sum of Two hundred & seven Dollars & Cents It is
therefore considered by the Court that the said Plaintiff recover of the
said defendant the said Sum of Dollars &
|