Monday May 9th 1859

James M. Mitchell  }  Edwards & Emmerson
        vs         }    Assumpsit
John V. Bigham     }
                     Dismissed by plaintiff with
leave to withdraw Exemplification of Judgment


George M. Chapman      }
       vs              }  Error
J.C. Pelot & Brother }


Enstein & Eckman       }  Edwards & Emerson
         vs            }  Assumpsit
Lewis Orbits           }  Maulden
                     Writ against Henry Wurzburg
witness for defendant to show cause at next term
of Court why he should not be fined for non-attendance


M.S. Brown Admtr      }  McLin
         vs           } Assumpsit
Joseph Baldwin        }  Bernard
                      And now on this day came the
parties by their respective Attornies, and the Defendant 
saying nothing in bar or preclusion of the plaintiffs 
right to recover On motion of Plaintiffs Attorney it 
is ordered that the plaintiff do have his Judgement against 
the defendant by default and that the Clerk do assess the 
damages, Whereupon the Clerk having assessed the Damages 
at Ninety Six        dollars & Forty cents 
It is Ordered Considered & adjudged by the Court that the 
plaintiff do have & recover of and from the defendant the 
said Sum of                    dollars &         
cents For his damages together with his Cost in this behalf 
Expended taxed at  Three        dollars &  Ninety five Cents 
and the defendant in Mercy &c



M.S. Brown Adm        }               McLin
         vs           } Assumpt
D.A. Frier            }               Bernard
                      And now on this day came the par
ties by their respective Attornies and the defendant 
saying nothing in bar or preclusion of the plaintiffs right 
to recover On Motion of plaintiffs Attorney it is or-
dered that the plaintiff do have his Judgment against