Tuesday  December 14                        1858

E. Remington   } Dewson
     vs        }          This case dismissed on Motion
W.M. Cathcart  } of Plaintiffs Attorney

J.F. O Neal    } Dawkins
     vs        }
W.J. Voss      } Means
                          And now on this day came the 
Parties by their respective attorneys and the defendant 
Saying nothing in bar or preclusion of the Plaintiff 
right to recover on Motion of Plaintiffs attorneys it is 
Ordered that the plaintiff do have his Judgement again
st the defendant by default and that the Clerk do 
assess the damages whereupon the Clerk having assessed the 
damages at             dollars              Cents 
It is Ordered considered and adjudged by the Court that 
the Plaintiff do have and recover of and from the defen
dant the Said Sum of 
                    dollars                     Cents
For his damages together with his Costs in this be
half expended taxed at 
             dollars                            Cents 
And the defendant in Mercy &c


Thomas C. Standly    }    Bernard
        vs           }
Lemuel Wilson        }    Bradford & McLin
                                    And now on this 
day came the Parties by their respective attorneys
and the defendant Saying nothing in bar or pre
clusion of the Plaintiff rights to recover on Motion 
of Plaintiff attorneys it is Ordered that the Plaintiff 
do have his Judgement against the defendant 
by default and that the Clerk do assess the damages 
whereupon the Clerk having assessed the damages at 
                   dollars                        Cents 
It is Ordered considered and adjudged by the Court that 
the Plaintiff do have and recover of and from the def
endant the Said Sum of 
               dollars                          Cents 
And the defendant in Mercy &c